Mikael Fehlberg says: I've noticed several comments about spelling errors, and comments about the text. To which I would reply with one of my favorite quotes: "The fish trap exists because of the fish. Once you've gotten the fish you can forget the trap. The rabbit snare exists because of the rabbit. Once you've gotten the rabbit, you can forget the snare. Words exist because of meaning. Once you've gotten the meaning, you can forget the words. Where can I find a man who has forgotten words so I can talk with him?"- Chuang Tzu Typed text would loose a big part of the FEELING of what is being said. The use of onomatopoeias, and writing words with a style of how they are said add a big part to the comic. For example in this comic the "shaky" way "y-yes" is written adds to the feeling of how he says it. To have it in an standard text would detract from the art that has gone into the lettering of the text. As far as spelling errors, well, look beyond regimented rules of diction, and extract the simple feeling and meaning of what is being said. As opposed to getting hung up on weather (whether)or not someone used the correct "their or there" or "wright or write" when it's obvious which usage of the word is implied. Now, would it be "better" if there were no un-intentional spelling errors and typos? Yes, perhaps, but only to the extent that it would cease to bother the gramaticly anal. Who are unable to look beyond the structure of a language that exists for the intent to portray feeling and thought. Who might otherwise get an un-annoyed comprehension of the story.